Youtube Exercise » English Grammar Homework

B2-C1

Judge Catches Witness Being Fed Answers by Smart Glasses

Steve Lehto

329K views 2 months ago

Warm-up Questions

What do you think “smart glasses” can do, and why might they cause problems in a courtroom?
If a judge thinks a witness is being helped during testimony, what should happen next?
Why do you think the title says the witness was “caught” being fed answers?

Up Next

Harry Potter (9 of 13) – The Mirror Classic Movie Clips
Why It Feels Like Every Company Suddenly Wants To Sell You Protein CNBC
Why Is Ocean Water Salty? | Earth's Ocean | Dr Binocs Show | Peekaboo Kidz Peekaboo Kidz
Comparatives and Superlatives | Learn English | EasyTeaching EasyTeaching
Top 10 Most Expensive Cars in the World (2026) Richify

Start With: Word Definition

Order: Alphabetical Random

…

Judge Catches Witness Being Fed Answers by Smart Glasses

The allegation: smart-glasses coaching in court (00:00 – 02:50)

Transcript will load here…

1. What made people in court suspicious about the witness at first?

He had long pauses before answering questions.
He refused to take an oath.
He changed his seat repeatedly.
He kept making jokes during testimony.

2. What happened after the witness removed the glasses?

The witness left the courtroom immediately.
The judge ended the trial on the spot.
The mobile phone began broadcasting a voice.
The interpreter refused to continue.

3. Who did the judge say was coaching the witness?

The judge said it was the interpreter.
The judge identified a lawyer in the courtroom.
The judge said it was ChatGPT.
The judge said she did not need to determine who it was.

Judge Catches Witness Being Fed Answers by Smart Glasses

The ruling and why it matters for evidence (02:50 – 05:20)

Transcript will load here…

1. According to the judge’s quote, what was the effect of the witness’s behavior on his testimony?

His evidence became stronger because it was coached.
His evidence was postponed until the next day.
His evidence was accepted but with minor concerns.
His evidence became unreliable and untruthful.

2. What comparison does the speaker make to explain how courts treat untrustworthy behavior?

A comparison to jury selection rules.
A comparison to perjury penalties automatically applying.
A comparison to evidence spoliation creating a presumption.
A comparison to plea bargains in criminal cases.

3. What does the speaker say is the real issue with being fed answers live while testifying?

It is only a problem if the witness is speaking English.
It suggests the witness does not have firsthand knowledge.
It proves the witness has perfect memory.
It slows down the court schedule.

Judge Catches Witness Being Fed Answers by Smart Glasses

Broader implications, technology, and the wrap-up (05:20 – 09:39)

Transcript will load here…

1. What did the speaker say happened to a past plan involving smart glasses in court?

It was canceled right before it happened.
It was approved by multiple judges.
It was tested successfully for years.
It became a common legal practice.

2. What does the speaker suggest about this type of cheating with technology?

It may have happened before, but this time it was caught.
It is probably the first time it has ever happened.
It is impossible because courts ban all devices.
It only happens in small courts, not high courts.

3. Why does the speaker mention “Abracadabra” near the end?

Because the judge used it as a code word in court.
Because it is the legal term for coached testimony.
Because it is the name of the property development company.
Because it was the contact name on the phone and he digresses about its origins.

Judge Catches Witness Being Fed Answers by Smart Glasses

Transcript will load here…

1. In a courtroom, why is it especially problematic if a witness receives coaching during cross-examination?

Because cross-examination is only about spelling and pronunciation.
Because only judges are allowed to speak during cross-examination.
Because cross-examination is designed to test the witness’s knowledge and credibility.
Because cross-examination is optional and does not affect the case.

2. What is the main reason live-fed answers can damage the value of testimony?

They show the testimony may not be based on firsthand knowledge.
They make the witness speak too quietly.
They increase the length of the trial automatically.
They are always legal if a phone is involved.

3. What can a judge reasonably conclude if a witness is found to be untruthful about important details while testifying?

The witness’s evidence may be considered unreliable.
The court must restart the trial from the beginning.
The witness automatically wins the case.
The judge must ignore the witness completely in every situation.

Discussion Questions

Discuss the ideas from this video

Judge Catches Witness Being Fed Answers by Smart Glasses

Should smart glasses and similar devices be banned in courtrooms? Why or why not?
If a witness is caught receiving help, what consequences (if any) are fair?
How is preparing a witness before court different from feeding a witness answers during testimony?
What other situations (school, work, interviews) raise similar issues about “cheating” with technology?