Youtube Exercise » English Grammar Homework

B2-C1

The Toulmin Model of Argumentation: Claims, Data, and Warrants, Oh My! – Logic Series | Academy …

Academy 4 Social Civics

12K views 4 years ago

Warm-up Questions

When you hear “The Toulmin Model of Argumentation,” what do you think the video will teach you to do?
Where do you usually use arguments (school essays, debates, online comments, work)?
What makes an argument convincing to you: facts, logic, examples, or emotion?

Up Next

Friends: The Friends Pretend To Like Rachel’s English Trifle (Season 6 Clip) | TBS TBS
CHINESE BUSINESS CULTURE and Etiquette Tips – China vs. The West – Ask Us Series EP 1 Everyday Easy Chinese
Brazil now biggest consumer of cosmetic surgery CGTN America
Bruno Mars – Count On Me (Official Video) someonecomespeakform
Early Learning Stories | I See | Phonics | Stories for Kindergarten Little Fox – Kids Stories and Songs

Start With: Word Definition

Order: Alphabetical Random

…

The Toulmin Model of Argumentation: Claims, Data, and Warrants, Oh My! – Logic Series | Academy …

A weak argument and why it fails (00:00 – 01:27)

Transcript will load here…

1. What is one specific “evidence” the cat hater uses to support their claim?

A scientific study about cat behavior
A shelter worker’s recommendation
Personal experience: they’ve never met a nice cat

2. What does the speaker do at the end of the shelter story?

They ignore the person and adopt a cat.
They decide to adopt a dog instead.
They leave the shelter without adopting any pet.

3. Why does the speaker say the “cats are terrible companions” argument is weak?

It is too emotional and uses too many statistics.
It focuses on dogs instead of cats.
It uses generalizations, provides little evidence, and avoids rebuttals.

The Toulmin Model of Argumentation: Claims, Data, and Warrants, Oh My! – Logic Series | Academy …

The Toulmin model: core parts (claim, data, warrant) (01:27 – 02:55)

Transcript will load here…

1. In the video, what does “data” mean in an argument?

A word that reduces how strong a claim sounds
The main opinion you are trying to prove
Evidence used to support your claim

2. How does the speaker describe warrants most of the time?

They are always written as a clear sentence.
They are the same thing as rebuttals.
They are usually unspoken assumptions.

3. According to the video, which three components are fundamental to an argument?

Introductions, body paragraphs, and conclusions
Backing, rebuttals, and qualifiers
Claims, data, and warrants

The Toulmin Model of Argumentation: Claims, Data, and Warrants, Oh My! – Logic Series | Academy …

Supplementary parts and how to use the model (02:55 – 05:28)

Transcript will load here…

1. Why might a warrant need “backing,” according to the video?

Because warrants are often implied and not everyone shares the same assumptions
Because backing replaces the need for evidence
Because backing makes the claim undisputable

2. What is the purpose of a qualifier in the Toulmin model?

To add more data to the argument
To insult the opposing side
To show the extent/universality of the claim (how often it applies)

3. What is the final question the speaker asks the viewer to think about?

Whether emotional outbursts are helpful in debates
How the Toulmin model compares to essay structure taught at school
Whether cats or dogs make better pets

The Toulmin Model of Argumentation: Claims, Data, and Warrants, Oh My! – Logic Series | Academy …

Transcript will load here…

1. Which best describes the Toulmin model in this video?

A rule that proves which opinions are correct
A way to memorize essay vocabulary
A method for breaking an argument into parts for analysis

2. What is one reason an argument can still be weak even if it includes all Toulmin components?

Because qualifiers always make arguments less credible
Because the components might not interact and build upon each other well
Because arguments must never include rebuttals

3. How does the video say the model can help with communication?

It helps you avoid considering other perspectives
It helps you avoid emotional outbursts and present ideas logically
It helps you win by using more complicated words

Discussion Questions

Discuss the ideas from this video

The Toulmin Model of Argumentation: Claims, Data, and Warrants, Oh My! – Logic Series | Academy …

Think of a recent disagreement you saw (online, school, work). What was the claim, and what data supported it (if any)?
Do you agree that a claim should be “debatable” and not an “indisputable fact”? Give an example of each.
Which is harder in real life: giving strong data, stating the warrant clearly, or responding to rebuttals? Why?
The video says emotional outbursts can reduce credibility. Do you think emotion always harms arguments, or can it sometimes help?